Ravi Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33579 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-84 Year-2026 Thana- TILAUTHU District- Rohtas ====================================================== Ravi Yadav S/O Late Saheb Yadav R/O Village- Tillouthu, p.s- Tillouthu, District- Rohtas, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Jai Prakash Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 17-06-2026 Heard Mr. Jai Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since 09.04.2026 in connection with Tillouthu P.S. Case No. 84 of 2026, F.I.R. dated 08.04.2026 for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018 .
3. Recovery is of 330 liters of illicit country made liquor.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that it appears from the F.I.R. as well as seizure list that nothing has been recovered from the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33579 of 2026(3) dt.17-06-2026 2/3 conscious possession of the petitioner rather the recovery of total 330 liters of country made liquor has been recovered from place of occurrence and petitioner was apprehended from the place of occurrence and he has informed the police that he used to supply the liquor to one Ajay Choudhary. It appears from the seizure list that the seizure list witnesses are police personnel so, there is non-compliance of Section 103/105 of the BNSS, 2023. The petitioner is in custody since 09.04.2026. 5 The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner carries two criminal antecedents other than the present one but fairly submits that he is on bail in both the pending matters.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Judge Excise, Court No. II, Rohtas, Sasaram in connection with Tillouthu P.S. Case No. 84 of 2026 subject to the following conditions:- i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33579 of 2026(3) dt.17-06-2026 3/3 and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Vanisha/- U T