← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/7736/2017disposed

Ramesh Jha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2021-01-07Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7736 of 2017 ====================================================== Ramesh Jha Son of Late Vaidik Jha, Resident of Village and P.O.- Kothia, P.S. Bhairosthanpur, District- Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Water Resources, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Additional Secretary, Department of Water Resources, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

Special Secretary Cum Engineer in Chief, Department of Water Resources, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5.

Under Secretary Accounts, Department of Water Resources, Government of Bihar, Sinchai Bhawan, Patna 6.

Chief Engineer, Department of Water Resources, Valmikinagar, DistrictWest Champaran. 7.

The Superintending Engineer, Shirsha Works Circle Valmikinagar, Department of Water Resources, Gove null null 8.

The Exeutive Engineer, Shirsha Works Division, Valmikinagar, Department of Water Resources, Government 9.

District Collector, West Champaran, Bettiah.

10.

District Provident Fund Officer, West Champaran, Bettiah. 11.

The District Accounts Officer, West Champaran, Bettiah. 12.

The Treasury Officer, Bagaha, District West Champaran. 13.

The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Suresh Prasad Bhakta, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh- GA2 Mr. Arun Kumar Arun, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 07-01-2021 It appears that some error occurred in the order number.

Accordingly, let the order no. 5 be read as order no. 7. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CWJC No.7736 of 2017(8) dt.07-01-2021 2/2 Learned counsel for the respondent is present and submits that the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed, as detailed in the counter affidavit filed by respondent no. 13.

Considering the above submission, the writ application stands disposed of.

(Arvind Srivastava, J) shailendra/- U