← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/13820/2021disposed

Manju Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

2024-09-24Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13820 of 2021 ====================================================== Manju Kumari wife of Narayan das Verma resident of Village and P.O. Bichhwe, P.S. - Sikandara, District- Jamui.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

The Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director, Primary Education Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Magistrate, Jamui.

5.

The District Education Officer, Jamui.

6.

The District Programe Officer Establishment, Jamui. 7.

The Block Education Officer, Sikandra, District Jamui. 8.

The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Bichhwe P.S. Sikandra District Jamui.

9.

The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Bichhwe, Sikandra District Jamui. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Adv.

For the State :

Ms. Abhanjalli, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 24-09-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. By filing the present writ application, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 26.03.2021 passed by the Panchayat Secretary contained in Memo No. 13 dated 26.03.2021, whereby the employment of the petitioner has been cancelled on the basis of the order dated 07.08.2019 as contained in Memo No. 1236 and order contained in Letter No. 159 dated 13.07.2020 issued by the District Programme Officer

Patna High Court CWJC No.13820 of 2021(3) dt.24-09-2024 2/2 (Establishment), Jamui.

3. After perusing the materials on record, it appears that the petitioner has moved straight before this Court without following due procedure of approaching the learned District Appellate Authority.

4. In such view of the matter, this writ application is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file an appeal before the District Appellate Authority for consideration of her matter within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The District Appellate Authority is directed to consider the case of the petitioner and dispose the appeal filed by the petitioner by passing a speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible after hearing the parties. The District Appellate Authority is also directed to condone the delay in filing of the appeal by the petitioner as the case was pending before this Court.

5. With the aforesaid, this writ application stands disposed of.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U