Anup Lal Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2254 of 2015 Arising out of P.S. Case No. -183 Year- 2014 Thana - KHARAGPUR District- MUNGER =================================================== Anup Lal Sah Son of Late Chamru Sah Resident of Village - Kathana P.S- Kharagpur (Gangata), District - Munger. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s =================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Kumar Choudhary, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Ram Chandra Sahni (APP) =================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 02.

20.01.2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State.

The Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 25(1-B) A and 26 of the Arms Act.

Considering that the arms were not recovered from the personal possession of the Petitioner who claims to be aged about eighty years of age, let him be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in connection with Kharagpur (Gangta) P.S. Case No. 183 of 2014 (G.R. No. 1471 of 2014) subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioner

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2254 of 2015 (2) dt.20-01-2015 who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the Petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.) U T