← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./33251/2025bail granted

Shailesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-26Mr. Justice S. B. P. Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33251 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-151 Year-2025 Thana- GURUA District- Gaya ====================================================== Shailesh Yadav S/o Munshi Yadav R/o Village- Nimabigha, P.S.- Gurua, Distt.- Gaya At present R/o Vill.- Tetaria, P.S.- Gurua, Distt.- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sudhir Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Zainul Abedin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER 26-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Amendment Act.

3. Prosecution case in nutshell is that informant, being a police official, got a secret information that petitioner and other person were doing trade of liquor. When he reached at that place, 110 litres of country made liquor has been recovered behind the house of one Munna Mushar. Petitioner is alleged to have fled from the place of seizure.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33251 of 2025(2) dt.26-05-2025 2/3

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has no concern either with the alleged recovery or with the place of seizure. Nothing illicit has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner rather the liquor has been recovered behind the house of one Munna Mushar, which is an open place. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 11.04.2025. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33251 of 2025(2) dt.26-05-2025 3/3 satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Excise Court No. V, Gaya in connection with Gurua P.S. Case No. 151 of 2025.

(S. B. Pd. Singh, J) Nirajkrs/- U T