Sudama Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.51081 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -391 Year- 2014 Thana -GOPALGANJ, District- GOPALGANJ ====================================================== Sudama Sah, Son of Dhaneshwar Sah, Resident of Village - Barauli, Dakshini Tola, Police Station - Barauli District- Gopalganj .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raghav Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nand Kumar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 27-04-2015 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 461, 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted that the FIR was lodged against unknown. During investigation, the petitioner was arrested and thereafter, stolen articles have been recovered from his house. The petitioner is in custody since 9.09.2014.

The learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioner was arrested due to his suspected activity and he has made his confession before the police and at his instance, the stolen articles have been recovered from his house. The petitioner

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51081 of 2014 (7) dt.27-04-2015 2/2 has also criminal antecedents.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above-named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj/court concerned in Gopalganj P.S. Case No.391/2014 after framing of charge with the following conditions : 1.

One of the bailors will be the close relative of the petitioner.

2.

The petitioner will not indulge in similar or in any other offence.

3.

The petitioner will be well represented in the court.

4.

In case of absence for two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) V.K. Pandey/- U T