Patna High CourtCR. MISC./8983/2016bail granted

Raza Khan @ Mehroon @ Mehran Khan v. The State Of Bihar

2016-04-25Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.8983 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -158 Year- 2015 Thana -SHERGHATI District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Raza Khan @ Mehroon @ Mehran Khan Son of Sikander Khan, Resident of Village - Ghanghari, Police Station Sherghati, District - Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar No.- 4 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. M.Rab (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 25-04-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No. 158 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a and 26 of the Arms Act. Allegedly, from the room of the petitioner one loaded country made pistol and other looted incriminating articles were recovered.

Submission is that for recovery of alleged cash and articles, other case has been instituted, and in this case, which is under Arms Act, the petitioner is in custody since 30.06.2015, from earlier against the petitioner there is no case under the Arms Act.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8983 of 2016 (2) dt.25-04-2016 2/2 The learned A.P.P. submits that for recovery of other articles, another case has been lodged.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the detention of the petitioner, now the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Gaya in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No. 158 of 2015 subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) sushma/- U T