Nandu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32795 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-73 Year-2020 Thana- AKBARPUR District- Nawada ====================================================== Nandu Yadav (Male), aged about 24 years, Son of Sukhdev Yadav @ Sukdev Yadav Resident of village - Lohsinghna, P.S. - Akbarpur, District - Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Deepak Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 05-03-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Akbarpur P.S. Case No. 73 of 2020 registered for offences under sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

As per allegation, the police has recovered altogether 12 liters of illegal Mahua wine from the possession of the petitioner.

Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case as also considering the quantity of liquor recovered by the police, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32795 of 2020(2) dt.05-03-2021 2/2 Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II cum Special Judge, Nawada in connection with Akbarpur P.S. Case No. 73 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for investigation/interrogation, he will remain present and if he would not present himself, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been canceled. It is also made clear that if the petitioner is repeats the similar offence in future, the prosecution will be at liberty to file an application for cancellation of the bail.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T