Patna High CourtCR. MISC./33394/2026bail granted

Dinesh Lal Yadav @ Dinesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2026-06-24Mr. Justice Ansul3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33394 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-51 Year-2024 Thana- Rail Jaynagar District- Samastipur ====================================================== Dinesh Lal Yadav @ Dinesh Yadav S/O Suryadev Yadav R/O Vill.- Chhapradhi, P.S- Khajauli, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravindra Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANSUL ORAL ORDER 24-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Jay Nagar Rail P.S. Case No. 51 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 109, 303(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the informant saw four unknown miscreants assaulting his son and when the informant tried to intervene, the miscreants attacked him with a pistol butt, robbed his bag and fled away from the place of occurrence leaving him injured.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33394 of 2026(4) dt.24-06-2026 2/3 present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. Name of the petitioner has transpired in this case on the basis of confessional statement made by co-accused, namely, Dinesh Lal Yadav and the same has got no evidentiary value. It is next submitted that no specific allegation has been attributed against the petitioner rather the same is general and omnibus in nature. The petitioner is in custody since 19.05.2025 and has got nine criminal antecedents. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that other co-accused has been granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated 04.08.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 27751 of 2025.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33394 of 2026(4) dt.24-06-2026 3/3 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Jay Nagar Rail P.S. Case No. 51 of 2024.

(Ansul, J) Siddharth Soni/- U T