Manoj Sao v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33288 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-110 Year-2019 Thana- KHAIRA District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.

Manoj Sao Son of Kameshwar Sao Resident of Nimarang, P.S. and DistrictJamui. 2.

Md. Imtiaz @ Md. Imtiyaz @ Md. Imtiyaz Ansari Son of Late Rajo Mian Resident of Aamjhari, P.S.- Sono, District- Jamui. 3.

Dinesh Sao Son of Late Doman Sao Resident of Godra, P.S.- Khaira, District- Jamui.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Satya Prakash Parasar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Prem Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL ORAL ORDER 20-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners seek bail in connection with Khaira P.S. Case No. 110 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 11(E) (J) of Animal Cruelty Act and Sections 47, 48, 49, 50 and 96 of Transportation of Animal Act.

Six oxen crammed in the pick-up van were being transported for smuggling and petitioners were apprehended sitting in the said pick-up van.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33288 of 2019(2) dt.20-05-2019 2/2 petitioners that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. Petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner no. 1 happens to be driver of the aforesaid pick-up van. Out of the aforesaid six oxen five were purchased by the petitioner Md. Imtiyaz from one Munna of village Nawada and one was purchased by the petitioner Dinesh Sao from one Nawal Mali and they were transporting the aforesaid oxen by the aforesaid vehicle for their own uses. They have no concern with any activity of smuggling of cattle. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent and have been languishing in custody since 15.04.2019.

On the other hand, learned APP for the State opposed the bail prayer of the petitioners.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Jamui in connection with Khaira P.S. Case No. 110 of 2019.

(Prakash Chandra Jaiswal, J) rohit/- U T