Ramdeo Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8817 of 2023 ====================================================== 1.
Ramdeo Yadav Son of Late Kardhani Yadav Resident of village- Gangati, Police Station- Amas, District- Gaya.
2.
Jaswa Devi Wife of late Shiv Prasad Yadav Resident of village- Gangati, Police Station- Amas, District- Gaya.
3.
Birju Yadav Son of late Bishun Yadav, Resident of village- Gangati, Police Station- Amas, District- Gaya.
4.
Ramashray Yadav Son of late Kalpu Yadav, Resident of village- Gangati, Police Station- Amas, District- Gaya.
5.
Kameshwari Devi Wife of late Tega Yadav, Resident of village- Gangati, Police Station- Amas, District- Gaya.
6.
Subhash Yadav Son of late Saryu Yadav, Resident of village- Gangati, Police Station- Amas, District- Gaya.
7.
Ram Swaroop Yadav Son of late Kalpu Yadav, Resident of village- Gangati, Police Station- Amas, District- Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through District Magistrate, Gaya. 2.
The District Land Acquisition Officer-Cum-Competent Authority, Gaya. 3.
The Circle Officer, Amas, District-Gaya.
4.
The National Highway Authority of India, through Competent Authority, Gaya, District- Gaya.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners :
Mr. Jitendra Prasad Singh, Advocate For the State :
Md. Khurshid Alam, AAG-12 For the N.H.A.I.
:
Mr. Kumar Gautam, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-01-2024
1. Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners requests for disposal of this writ application with a direction to the District Land Acquisition Officer-cumCompetent Authority, Gaya (Respondent No. 2) to dispose of
Patna High Court CWJC No.8817 of 2023(5) dt.08-01-2024 2/2 the objection filed by the petitioners, which is pending before him, dated 07.09.2021 (Annexure-1 series to the writ application).
3. In view of the limited prayer made on behalf of the petitioners, this writ application is disposed of with a direction to the District Land Acquisition Officer-cum-Competent Authority, Gaya (Respondent No. 2) to dispose of the objection dated 07.09.2021 (Annexure-1 series to the writ application) which is said to have been filed by the petitioners, in accordance with law, after hearing the parties, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U