← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41965/2025allowed

Ramjee Sah @ Ramjee Saw v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-22Mr. Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41965 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-234 Year-2024 Thana- JAHANABAD District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Ramjee Sah @ Ramjee Saw Son of Late Ajay Sah @ Ajay Saw Resident of Village- Erki, P.S. and District- Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nityanand Neeraj, Advocate Kumari Anjani Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anil Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 22-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 234 of 2024, instituted under Section 414 of the I.P.C. and Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, 80 litre illicit liquor and some equipments used for making liquor from four houses situated at Bhuitola Erki Village have been recovered.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case due to village politics as his house is situated near the place of occurrence. Petitioner was not present on the spot. No incriminating material has been recovered either from his

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41965 of 2025(4) dt.22-09-2025 2/2 possession or from his house. He has no concern with the seized liquor. Petitioner is a labourer and had gone outside of his house for livelihood. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He undertakes to co-operate in the investigation and trial. Similarly situated co-accused persons, namely, Shyampari Devi and Sukehari Manjhi have already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court, vide orders dated 02.09.2025 and 16.09.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. Nos. 42343 of 2025 and 41958 of 2025 respectively.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the Petitioner, above-named, be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge Excise 2nd, Jehanabad in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 234 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482 (2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.), 2023.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) rakhi/- U T