Patna High CourtL.P.A/455/2016disposed

Prabhu Nath Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-03-24Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh,The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.455 of 2016 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7030 of 2014 =========================================================== Prabhu Nath Singh, S/o Late Mokhtar Singh, R/o Villag Puraina, P.O. Rachhopali, P.S.- Barhariya, Distt- Siwan. Principal, Ajeet Kumar Singh Inter College, Puraina, Paltu Hata, Barhariya, Siwan, Secretary of Governing Body cum Managing Committe, Ajeet Kumar Singh Inter College.

.... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna

3. The Director, Secondary Education, New Secretariat, Government of Bihar, Patna

4. The Bihar School Examination Board through its Secretary, Budh Marg, Patna

5. Mr. Rajmani Prasad Sinha, Chairman, the Bihar School Examination Board, Patna

6. Mr. Ashutosh Kumar, Secretary, the Bihar School, Examination Board, Patna

7. The Deputy Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board, Patna

8. The District Education Officer, Siwan

9. Bachcha Singh Son of Late Bageshwari Singh Resident Of Village Paltu Hata, P.S. & P.O. Paltu Hata, District - Siwan .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Gyan Shankar, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 24-03-2017 While disposing of C.W.J.C. No.7030 of 2014 on 01.12.2015, the learned Writ Court directed the Chairman of the Examination Board to consider the question of donor ship, which was pending decision for a period of 10 years in accordance to the Rule after hearing the parties within a period of three months.

Patna High Court LPA No.455 of 2016 dt.24-03-2017 2/2 We find that the Chairman has decided the issue and that being so, now this appeal is rendered infructuous. In case, any grievance still subsists after decision of the Chairman, liberty shall be available to the appellant to challenge the decision of the Chairman afresh in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the appeal stands disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 29.03.2017 Transmission Date