← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./34341/2022dismissed

Sikander Kumar @ Sikander Ram @ Bittu v. The State Of Bihar

2022-09-12Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34341 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-7 Year-2021 Thana- BEN P.S. District- Nalanda ====================================================== SIKANDER KUMAR @ SIKANDER RAM @ BITTU S/o Ram Prasad Ram @ Ram Prasad R/o - Vill- Jhandu Bigha, P.S. - Ben, Distt.- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amresh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Aslam Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 12-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Let the defect(s), if any, as pointed out by the office, be removed within four weeks.

The case is registered under sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Ben P.S. Case No. 07 of 2021.

As per the prosecution story, it has been alleged that the deceased had married the present petitioner a year ago but was regularly tortured for want of dowry and on 11.1.2021 he got information about death of his sister. It is alleged that in course of investigation, it has come that she had a fight with her mother-in-law after she committed suicide.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34341 of 2022(2) dt.12-09-2022 2/2 Learned APP on the other hand submits that the mother-in-law moved before this Court and took the alibi that she is separate in mess and bound with the couple and has no concern with the alleged occurrence and as such now the petitioner cannot be allowed to take different alibi. Taking into account the aforesaid facts that the petitioner is the husband, he cannot escape the responsibility from having failed to protect the lady who is now no more as also the fact that the FIR was lodged on 11.1.2021 and the petitioner came into judicial custody only on 25.5.2022, this Court is not inclined to grant any relief to him and the bail application is accordingly rejected.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/Ajay Singh U T