Suraj Dom v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1982 of 2015 Arising out of P.S. Case No. -116 Year- 2014 Thana - PARASBIGHA District- JEHANABAD =================================================== Suraj Dom Son of Sri Hartali Dom Resident of Mohalla - Ambedkar Nagar, P.S. - Jehanabad , Distt. - Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Bihar State Electricity Board, Bihar, Patna. .... .... Opposite Party/s =================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar 1 (APP) =================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 02.

19.01.2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State.

The Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 136 of the Electricity Act. Considering that the Petitioner is in custody since 06.10.2014 for recovery of electric wire but he has fair antecedents and his maternal uncle, Ranvijay Ram undertakes his responsibility, let him be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Special Judge (Electricity) Magadh Area, Gaya in connection with Paras Bigha P.S. Case No. 116 of 2014 (G.R. No. 498 of 2014) subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioner who will

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1982 of 2015 (2) dt.19-01-2015 give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner and the other bailor shall be the uncle of the Petitioner namely. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse.

(iv) That the Petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.) U T