Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32187/2020bail granted

Vikky Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2021-01-05Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32187 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-96 Year-2020 Thana- BOCHAHAN District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== VIKKY KUMAR Son of Arun Kumar Sahni @ Arun Sahni Resident of Village - Dhobauli, P.S.- Gaighat, District - Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ravi Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 05-01-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed an undertaking to remove all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter as and when required. It is accordingly directed that all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter be removed within one month hereof.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 12.04.2020 in connection with Bochaha P.S. Case No. 96 of 2020 for the alleged offences under Sections 356, 379, 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with snatching of the mobile phone of the informant by two persons on a Yamaha motorcycle. The petitioner has suffered custody for over 8 months and claims clean antecedents.

4. Learned APP appears and has been heard.

5. Be that as it may and having regard to the period of custody already suffered since 12.04.2020, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32187 of 2020(2) dt.05-01-2021 2/2 the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 14th-cum-Sub Judge, Muzaffarpur in connection with Bochaha P.S. Case No. 96 of 2020, if he is not otherwise required in any other case.

6. Office shall follow-up to ensure that all defects are removed and compliance with the notices of this Court are made by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para 1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T