Rinku Kumari @ Rinku Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34609 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2022 Thana- TAJPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== RINKU KUMARI @ RINKU DEVI W/o Parameshwar Kumar Paswan R/o village- Dharampur Dakhili, P.S.- Tajpur (Halai O.P.), District- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.

The Vigilance Investigation Bureau, through its Deputy Superintendent of Police Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mahendra Pratap, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajay Mishra, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 28-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a woman and the informant alleges that the petitioner secured appointment as Panchayat Teacher based on forged experience certificate of Aanganwadi Sahaiyika.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34609 of 2022(2) dt.28-11-2022 2/2 next submitted that the present F.I.R came to be instituted based on an inquiry conducted behind the back of petitioner. It is also submitted that had an opportunity been given to the petitioner to explain her side of the case, perhaps the present F.I.R would not have been instituted.

Learned A.P.P for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Tajpur P.S. Case No. 181 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T