← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2279/2015dismissed

Anil Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2015-05-15Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2279 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -226 Year- 2013 Thana -BHAGWANPUR DistrictVAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ====================================================== Anil Ram S/o Dina Ram Resident of Village Ratanpura, P.S. Bhagwanpur, District Vaishali.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anish Chandra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 15-05-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the APP for the State.

The husband of the deceased is accused in Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 226 of 2013 for the offences punishable under sections 304-B and 201/34 IPC and seeks bail. According to the FIR, the deceased was married to the petitioner. She was done to death in the matrimonial home in mysterious circumstances inasmuch as the dead body of the deceased was cremated. When the father enquired about the victim no satisfactory explanation was given save and except that she was suffering from some ailments.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2279 of 2015 (4) dt.15-05-2015 2 / 2 presence of the petitioner at the house itself shows his innocence. The victim died a natural death. The petitioner is in custody since 20.03.2014. There is no allegation in the FIR that the victim was tortured/ill-treated on account of non fulfilment of demand of dowry.

Learned APP conversely submitted that in his restatement the informant has categorically alleged demand of dowry.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court, for the present, is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. His prayer for bail is accordingly rejected. However, considering the period of incarceration of the petitioner it is observed that if the charges are not framed and trial is taken up within seven months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the petitioner shall have liberty to make prayer for bail before the trial court itself. (Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) HR/- U