Praveen Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6799 of 2016 (2) dt.02-03-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6799 of 2016 Arising Out of Alamnagar (Ratwara O.P.) PS.Case No. -73 Year- 2015 Thana -ALAMNAGAR District- MADHEPURA ====================================================== Praveen Yadav, Son of Chhotelal Yadav, Resident of Village- Kapsiyai, P.S Alamnagar, (Ratwara O.P), District Madhepura. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Anant Kumar-1, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Madhura Nand Jha (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 02-03-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Alamnagar (Ratwara O.P.) P.S. Case No. 73 of 2015 (G.R. No.388 of 2015) registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-B)a, 26 of the Arms Act.

Allegedly the petitioner was caught after chase and from his possession one country made loaded pistol was recovered.

Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 27.05.2015, nothing was recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner and he has been made victim of the circumstances, the wife of the petitioner after getting the police officer in collusion, got implicated the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6799 of 2016 (2) dt.02-03-2016 petitioner.

The learned A.P.P. submits that the petitioner has got criminal antecedent.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SubDivisional Judicial Magistrate, Uda-Kishunganj, in connection with Alamnagar (Ratwara O.P.) P.S. Case No.73 of 2015, subject to conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Amit/- U T