Vikram Yadav @ Vikram Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37017 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1150 Year-2023 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya ====================================================== Vikram Yadav @ Vikram Kumar Son of Dinesh Yadav R/O Vil.- Sonaut, P.S.- Muffasil, Dist.- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Priya Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 31-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 1150 of 2023 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

Prosecution case in a nutshell is that while informant was on his way, he was accosted with co-accused persons, including the petitioner, who assaulted him by means of pistol, knife, iron rod and snatched Rs. 10,000/- and fled away.

4.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 28-02-2024. Petitioner is a

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37017 of 2024(3) dt.31-07-2024 2/3 man of clean antecedent.

5.

It has been further submitted by the petitioner's counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. There is no specific allegation against the petitioner, rather allegation is general and omnibus in nature. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. From perusal of the injury report, it is found that two injuries are simple in nature while one injury is grievous in nature. It is lastly submitted that charge sheet has already been submitted 6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner, clean antecedent of the petitioner, there being no specific allegation against the petitioner and charge sheet being submitted, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

8.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 1150 of 2023, subject to the following

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37017 of 2024(3) dt.31-07-2024 3/3 conditions:

(I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T