← Library
Patna High CourtCR. APP (SJ)/3112/2021allowed

Robin Singh @ Bade Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2021-09-13Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.3112 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3 Year-2019 Thana- GUTHANI District- Siwan ====================================================== ROBIN SINGH @ BADE SINGH, S/O RAMESH SINGH @ RAMESH KUMAR SINGH R/O VILLAGE- SOHAGRA PURAB PATTI, P.S.- GUTHANI, DISTRICT- SIWAN ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Prabhakar Singh, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sadanand Paswan, Spl. P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 13-09-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.

The instant appeal has been preferred against the order dated 3.6.2021 passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge 1st-cum-Special Judge, Siwan whereby the prayer for bail of the appellant in connection with a case registered under section 307 and other sections of the Indian Penal Code and section 3(1)(r)(s) of the S.C. and S.T. Act was rejected.

As per allegations in the F.I.R., the three accused persons including the appellant herein are stated to have assaulted the informant.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3112 of 2021(3) dt.13-09-2021 2/2 that the appellant has been falsely implicated in the case. From perusal of the F.I.R., it would transpire that the main allegation is against accused Roshan Singh. The appellant is in custody since 6.2.2021. All the injuries have been found to be simple in nature.

The appeal is opposed by learned Special P.P. appearing for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case together with the contents of the injury report and the petitioner having remained in custody since 6.2.2021, the appeal is allowed and the order dated 3.6.2021 impugned herein is set aside.

The appellant is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Guthni P.S. Case no.3 of 2019 (Special Case no.11 of 2021) on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge Ist-cum-Special Judge, Siwan.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Saurabh/- U T