Patna High CourtCR. MISC./34631/2022bail granted

Dilip Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-11-28Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34631 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-96 Year-2021 Thana- PANDARAK District- Patna ====================================================== DILIP KUMAR SON OF SURESH YADAV R/O VILLAGECHHAPEDATAR, P.S.- PANDARAK, DISTRICT- PATNA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gyanendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 28-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code & Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that petitioner along with Pappu and Ranjeet assaulted her son and nephew and all the three accused fired but the victim saved themselves.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that no one was injured on account of assault and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34631 of 2022(2) dt.28-11-2022 2/2 as far as the allegation of firing is alleged, the same is ornamental as no one was even injured by firearm. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Pandarak P.S. Case No. 96 of 2021 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T