Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6803/2016bail granted

Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2016-02-29Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6803 of 2016 (2) dt.29-02-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6803 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -225 Year- 2015 Thana -DAUDNAGAR District- AURANGABAD ======================================================

1. Vikash Kumar S/o Kalendra Prasad R/o Vill New Sub-Division Daudnagar, P.s Daudnagar, District Aurangabad..... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 29-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Daudnagar P.S. Case No. 225 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 399, 402, 412 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, the petitioner and some others were caught when they had assembled to make preparation for committing dacoity but from possession of the petitioner nothing was recovered and it is stated that mobile phones and motorcycles were recovered from the place of occurrence, in this case similarly situated co-accused Hemant Kumar has been allowed bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 7181 of 2016 by another co-ordinate Bench of this Court.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6803 of 2016 (2) dt.29-02-2016 petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Daudnagar, Aurangabad in connection with Daudnagar P.S. Case No. 225 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T