Mannu Mandal @ Manu Mandal @ Manoj Kumar Mandal @ Manj Kr. Mandal v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Revision No. 152 of 2016 =================================================== Mannu Mandal @ Manu Mandal @ Manoj Kumar Mandal @ Manj Kr. Mandal Son of Arjun@Arjun Mandal Resident of VillageDodhari P.s Sono District Jamui , through the natural guardianship of father namely Arun Mandal S/;o late Choudhary Mandal, R/o Dodhari P.S. Sono District Jamui.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Respondent/s =================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sinha, Adv. For the Respondent/s: Mr. Atul Chandra (APP) =================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER
03. 12.05.2016 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State. This revision application has been filed for setting aside the judgment and order dated 03.02.2016 passed by the Sessions Judge, Jamui in Cr. Appeal (Juvenile) No. 43 of 2015, by which he has affirmed the order dated 09.12.2015 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Jamui in G.R. No. 576 of 2015 arising out of Sono P.S. Case No. 63 of 2015, by which he has refused to release the Petitioner.
Considering that the Petitioner has fair antecedents and his father undertakes his responsibility, let him be released on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Juvenile Justice Board, Jamui in G.R. No. 576 of 2015 arising out of Sono P.S. Case No. 63 of 2015 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner and the other bailor shall be the father of the Petitioner. The bailor will also
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.152 of 2016 (3) dt.12-05-2016 undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the Petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.
Accordingly, the revision application is allowed and the judgment and order dated 03.02.2016 passed by the Sessions Judge, Jamui in Cr. Appeal (Juvenile) No. 43 of 2015, by which he has affirmed the order dated 09.12.2015 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Jamui in G.R. No. 576 of 2015 arising out of Sono P.S. Case No. 63 of 2015 is, hereby, set aside. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.) U T