Md. Suraj @ Najmur Saba Neyaz v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34682 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-18 Year-2022 Thana- UDAKISHUNGANJ District- Madhepura ====================================================== MD. SURAJ @ NAJMUR SABA NEYAZ SON OF MD. NEHALLUDDIN R/O VILLAGE- RAHTA, P.S.- UDAKISHUNGANJ, DISTRICTMADHEPURA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Alok Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anand Mohan Prasad Mehta, A.P.P ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 16-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 353, 332, 333, 188, 17(E) of the Indian Penal Code & Section 10 of the Loudspeaker Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that accused persons, including the petitioner, variously armed blocked the road, disturbed ambulance movement, created ruckus and also obstructed police in discharge of official duties as the informant along with the police force was chasing a criminal.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34682 of 2022(2) dt.16-11-2022 2/2 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that the allegations as alleged are general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted that petitioner being villager had gone to the place of occurrence to see that as to why the protest was being carried out when they came to know that owner of a nursing home was killed for which a protest was being carried out by the villagers for arresting the criminals. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Udakishunganj P.S. Case No. 18 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T