Prakash Jha @ Jay Prakash Jha v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45182 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-109 Year-2020 Thana- BARURAJ District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1.

Prakash Jha @ Jay Prakash Jha Son Of Shri Hemchandra Jha Resident Of Village - Chhatrapatti, P.S.- Baruraj, District - Muzaffarpur, Bihar. (843111) 2.

Chandan Jha Son Of Shri Bhushan Jha Resident Of Village - Chhatrapatti, P.S.- Baruraj, District - Muzaffarpur, Bihar. (843111) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Aaruni Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anuj Kumar Shrivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 21-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 307, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioners are said to have assaulted the informant by means of lathi, danda and farsa as a result of which he sustained injury.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45182 of 2021(3) dt.21-07-2022 2/2 petitioners that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case due to land dispute. He submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and both sides have sustained grievous injury. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners. He further submits that petitioners has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the fact that both sides have sustained grievous injury, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Baruraj P.S. Case No. 109 of 2020, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T