← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43570/2021bail granted

Harendra Paswan @ Rajendra Paswan @ Rajendra Pasavan v. The State Of Bihar

2021-10-29Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43570 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-298 Year-2020 Thana- CHANPATIA District- West Champaran ====================================================== HARENDRA PASWAN @ RAJENDRA PASWAN @ RAJENDRA PASAVAN Son of Kamal Paswan Resident of Village - Kurwa Kothi (Kudia Kothi), Kurwa Mathia, P.S.- Chanpatia (Kumarbag OP), Distt.- West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-10-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State through virtual mode.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of eight weeks.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in Chanpatia (Kumarbag O.P.) P.S. Case No. 298 of 2020 registered for the offence under Section-30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 26 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43570 of 2021(2) dt.29-10-2021 2/2 case. It is alleged that 26 liters wine is recovered by side of the road. The name of the petitioner has transpired in this case on the basis of disclosure made by local residents. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in the present case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise Act, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Chanpatia (Kumarbag O.P.) P.S. Case No. 298 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V.//- U T