Radheshyam Yadav @ Radheshyam Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43330 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-521 Year-2020 Thana- MOTIHARI MUFASIL District- East Champaran ====================================================== RADHESHYAM YADAV @ RADHESHYAM KUMAR Son of Ram Prasad Yadav @ Patiram Rai @ Ramn Prasad Ray Resident of Village - Dilwar Mathiya Bhopat, P.S.- Lakhaura, Distt.- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Prateek Tandon, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. I.Mahmood, Addl Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner prays for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, three unknown miscreants on the gun point looted cash, mobile phone, credit card, pan card and other articles of the informant.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner is not named in the FIR. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 12.1.2021. Investigation is complete.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43330 of 2021(3) dt.07-03-2022 2/2 Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail. He points out that looted motorcycle of the informant and country made pistol were recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

Considering the recovery of the motorcycle of the informant from the possession of the petitioner, his prayer for bail is refused.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashi/- U T