Ram Pravesh Chaudhary @ Pravesh Chaudhari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37352 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-566 Year-2023 Thana- ATRI District- Gaya ====================================================== Ram Pravesh Chaudhary @ Pravesh Chaudhari Son of Chandeshwar Chaudhary Resident of Vilage- Tetua Bazar, P.S. - Atri, District - Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Durgesh Nandan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Raj Ballabh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 11-07-2024 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304B, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner, being father-in-law, has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant, who is brother of the deceased. It is next submitted that son of the petitioner was married to the deceased about four years back and out of the wedlock, a child was born. It is further submitted that from perusal of allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that the informant is not an eye-witness to the occurrence, and general and omnibus allegation of torture and abuse is alleged against the petitioner. It is further submitted that allegation of demand of dowry is completely missing. It is next submitted that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37352 of 2024(3) dt.11-07-2024 2/2 no doubt the death of the victim was within seven years of marriage but then the victim and her husband along with child were residing separately. It is next submitted that whenever any occurrence of such nature is alleged to have taken place, the entire family members are implicated in a mechanical manner.

4.

It is also submitted that husband of the deceased is in custody since 5-7-2024.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Atri P.S. Case No. 566 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T