Raja Kumar Sahni @ Amitesh Raj @ Raja v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32589 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-823 Year-2024 Thana- HAJIPUR SADAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Raja Kumar Sahni @ Amitesh Raj @ Raja S/O Dukhan Sahni Resident of Village- Pahetiya, PS- Kajipur, Distt- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shanti Bhushan Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anish Chandra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 13-08-2025 Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable in connection with Hajipur Sadar P.S. Case No.823 of 2024 under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 pending before the court of C.J.M., Vaishali at Hajipur.

3. As per the prosecution, the FIR has been lodged against 3 named accused persons including the petitioner against whom there is allegation of assault by iron rod with a intention to kill the informant. There is also allegation of snatching cash of Rs.9,000/- from his pocket.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32589 of 2025(3) dt.13-08-2025 2/2 petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that both parties are agnates and due to land dispute, the present case has been filed by the informant.

5. Learned Counsel also submits that antecedent of the petitioner is clean.

6. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the specific allegation against the petitioner is that he has attacked with iron rod on the head of the informant due to which grievous injury has been caused.

7. In the present facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, therefore the bail application of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

8. However, trial court is directed to consider the regular bail application of the petitioner, if he surrenders within 6 weeks from today and prays for regular bail, then trial court shall pass order without being prejudice of the present order preferably on the same day.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) Prakashmani/- U T