← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32659/2025allowed

Md. Sahwaz @ Sahwaz v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-22Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32659 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-283 Year-2024 Thana- BARARI District- Katihar ====================================================== Md. Sahwaz @ Sahwaz S/o Md. Ishrafil R/o Husaina, P.S.- Barari, Distt.- Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 22-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with S.T. No. 153 of 2025 arising out of Barari P.S. Case No. 283 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 310(4), 310(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and 25(1)(B), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that police had received an information that 9-10 miscreants are planning to commit heinous offence. On this information, police raided the house of Md. Aslam. From his house, four persons were apprehended. Certain persons managed to escape. The apprehended persons named this petitioner along with others.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32659 of 2025(2) dt.22-05-2025 2/2 petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. It has further been submitted that his name has surfaced on the statement of the co-accused. Nothing has been recovered from his possession. He next submits that petitioner has got clean antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 05.12.2024.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX, Katihar in connection with S.T. No. 153 of 2025 arising out of Barari P.S. Case No. 283 of 2024.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Anushka/- U T