Pramod Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34801 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-307 Year-2024 Thana- MUSAHARI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Pramod Ram S/o Bindeshwar Ram @ Vindeshwar Ram Resident of VillageBinda, P.S.- Mushahari, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raju Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jagdhar Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Mushahri P.S. Case No. 307 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 352, 351(2) of the BNS.

3. As per the prosecution story, the informant has alleged that on 10.12.2024 when he went to ask for the due amount from Pramod Kumar (petitioner), he started abusing him and told that no amount was due. When the informant opposed, the petitioner gave a knife blow on the neck of the informant due to which he sustained injuries. Thereafter, petitioner assaulted him on his left eye due to which the informant become unconscious.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34801 of 2025(2) dt.29-05-2025 2/3 petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. All the allegations made against the petitioner is false, concocted and baseless. From perusal of F.I.R. it appears that allegation against the petitioner is that he attacked on the informant by means of knife. From perusal of injury report of informant, it would appear that the doctor has opined that the injury is simple in nature caused by sharp cut weapon. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the possession of petitioner. There is no eye witness of the alleged occurrence. Learned counsel further submits that after completion of investigation chargesheet has been submitted by the police in this case. Petitioner is man of clean antecedent and he is in custody since 10.12.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and considering the period under custody, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail after framing of charge on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-11th, Muzaffarpur in connection with Mushahri P.S. Case No. 307 of 2024 subject to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34801 of 2025(2) dt.29-05-2025 3/3 following conditions :- (i). Petitioner will remain physically present in trial on each and every date till the disposal of the case failing which, on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner may be cancelled by the Trial Court. (ii). One of the bailor shall be his family member. (S. B. Pd. Singh, J) Ankit Kumar/- U T