← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/8404/2020dismissed

Punam Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2020-11-25Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8404 of 2020 ====================================================== PUNAM DEVI wife of Sri Madan Kumar Singh resident of 62, Singh Bhawan, Dighal bank, P.o. and P.s.- Dighal Bank, District- Kishanganj, presently Pramukh of Block Panchayat Samiti, Dighal Bank, DistrictKishanganj ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 3.

The District Magistrate, Kishanganj, District- Kishanganj 4.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Kishanganj, District- Kishanganj 5.

The Block Development Officer-cum-Executive Officer, Block Panchayat Samiti, Dighal Bank, P.o. and P.s.- Dighal Bank, District- Kishanganj 6.

Smt. Akhtari Begum wife of not known to the petitioner, Presently UpPramukh of the Block Panchayat Samiti, Dighal Bank, P.o. and P.s.- Dighal Bank, District- Kishanganj 7.

Md. Sikandar son of not known to the petitioner, Panchayat Samiti Member 8.

Baleshhwar Yadav, son of not known to the petitioner, Panchayat Samiti 9.

Md. Miftahul Haque son of not known to the petitioner, Panchayat Samiti 10.

Ramanand Singh son of not known to the petitioner, Panchayat Samiti 11.

Dhirendra Kumar son of not known to the petitioner, Panchayat Samiti 12.

Atique Furhan son of not known to the petitioner, Panchayat Samiti Member 13.

Tej Narayan Giri son of not known to the petitioner, Panchayat Samiti

Patna High Court CWJC No.8404 of 2020(2) dt.25-11-2020 2/3 14.

Sanjouda Begum wife of not known to the petitioner, Panchayat Samiti 15.

Kokila Khatoon wife of not known to the petitioner, Panchayat Samiti 16.

Darkhasa Begum wife of not known to the petitioner, Panchayat Samiti 17.

Sulna Devi wife of not known to the petitioner, Panchayat Samiti Member of Block Panchayat Samiti, Dighal Bank through the Block Development 18.

Bibi Najefun wife of not known to the petitioner, Panchayat Samiti Member 19.

Bablu Murmu son of not known to the petitioner, Panchayat Samiti Member 20.

Bibi Gulabi wife of not known to the petitioner, Panchayat Samiti Member 21.

Nand Lal Harijan son of not known to the petitioner, Panchayat Samiti 22.

Pramila Devi wife of not known to the petitioner, Panchayat Samiti Member 23.

Nilam Praveen wife of not known to the petitioner, Panchayat Samiti 24.

Mustafi Begum wife of not known to the petitioner, Panchayat Samiti 25.

Noorjahan wife of not known to the petitioner, Panchayat Samiti Member of Block Panchayat Samiti, Dighal Bank through the Block Development

Patna High Court CWJC No.8404 of 2020(2) dt.25-11-2020 3/3 26.

Tanjjuma Khatoon wife of not known to the petitioner, Panchayat Samiti 27.

Nazim Akhtar son of not known to the petitioner, Panchayat Samiti Member ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shashi Bhushan Kumar Manglam, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Pratik Kumar Sinha, AC to AG ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 25-11-2020 As of now the Courts have not resumed normal physical hearing, the matter has been listed today for consideration through Video Conferencing.

The learned counsels are appearing and making submissions from their residence. The Court Master and Secretary are also part of this virtual court proceedings from their homes, all with the aid of audio visual technology.

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner, in presence of learned State Counsel, submits that since the petitioner has succeeded in the electoral process the writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) SNkumar/- U