Krishna Ballabh Kewat v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31135 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-150 Year-2010 Thana- NALANDA COMPLAINT CASE District- Nalanda ====================================================== KRISHNA BALLABH KEWAT S/o Somari Kewat R/o Village- Janakpur, P.S.- Khudaganj, District- Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.

Dr. Manoj Kumar @ Manoj Paswan S/o Pabitra Paswan, R/o Village- Samas Bujurg, P.S.- Barbigha, District- Sheikhpura, at present- Rajgeer Block More, P.S.- Rajgeer, District- Nalanda.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raj Kishor Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Syed Ehteshamuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 10-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Complaint Case No.150C/2010 registered for offence punishable under sections 323 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the allegation, the complainant is a R.M.P. Doctor and also connected with the trade of stone chips, for that, he has given money to the accused persons, but certain money has been returned and certain money is still lying with them.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31135 of 2019(2) dt.10-05-2019 2/2 is a dispute relates to business transaction. In such view of the matter, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed and he, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from today, is directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV, Biharsharif, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Complaint Case No.150C/2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 Cr. PC and also subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T