Vicky Singh @ Vicky Kumar @ Vikki Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 34792 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-148 Year-2026 Thana- MINAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Vicky Singh @ Vicky Kumar @ Vikki Singh S/o Manoj Singh R/o VillagePiparahan, PS- Minapur, (Panapur OP), Dist- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vandana Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sangeeta Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case in connection with Minapur P.S. Case No. 148 of 2026 dated 27.03.2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the allegation, total 226.260 litres of foreign liquor was recovered from a Pick-up van and the accused persons have succeeded to flee away after seeing the police party.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. It has further been submitted that petitioner was not arrested at the spot. It has further been submitted that the vehicle from which alleged recoveries have been made does not belong to the petitioner. It has further been submitted that the search

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 34792 of 2026(2) dt.20-05-2026 2/2 and seizure is in violation Section 105 B.N.S.S. It has further been submitted that the name of the petitioner has transpired on the basis of the statement of spy and has expressed suspicion against the petitioner. It has further been submitted that petitioner has been made accused in one another case of similar nature, but he is on bail.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Heard the parties and perused the record.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the nature of material against the petitioner, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Muzaffarpur in connection with Minapur P.S. Case No. 148 of 2026, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

8. The application stands allowed.

(Praveen Kumar, J) shivam/- U T