← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/15923/2018disposed

Ram Chandra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2026-05-12Mr. Justice Ajit Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15923 of 2018 ====================================================== Ram Chandra Prasad S/o Kuldeep Gope, resident of Village- Kabirpur, P.S.- Barbigah, District- Sheikhpura, presently working as a Lecturer in Sanskrit, Ram Lakhan Singh Yadav College, Aurangabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar and Ors 2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, through its Registrar. 4.

The Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya at Bodh Gaya. 5.

The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya at Bodh Gaya. 6.

The Finance Officer, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya at Bodh Gaya. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dinesh Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Subhash Chandra Mishra- Sc16 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 12-05-2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in consonance with the order dated 17.07.2018 of Hon'ble High Court passed in CWJC No. 17670/2017 of Akhilanand Singh and others, which matter subsequently travelled to the Hon'ble Apex Court vide SLP Nos. 29618-29619/2024, wherein an undertaking was given to resolve the issues by constituting a five-member committee to deal with the matter as per the directions of Hon'ble Apex Court. He further submits that the committee has already been constituted to scrutinize meritoriously the job profile of each individual with reference to

Patna High Court CWJC No.15923 of 2018(5) dt.12-05-2026 2/2 the records available with the University.

2. The petitioner seeks permission to file a detailed representation before the committee for examination of the issues involved and, upon such adjudication, if the claim is found to be justified, the respondents may be directed to extend all consequential benefits to the writ petitioner.

3. On the other hand, counsel for the Magadh University does not dispute the submissions and stands so taken by the counsel for the petitioner and this Court considering the stands taken by the parties, permits the petitioner to approach the committee so constituted, within a period of four weeks from today with all supportive materials, to show his bona fide for grant of all such benefits for which he had filed this writ petition and on filing of such claim before the committee so constituted, will consider his claim within a further period of eight weeks and necessary decisions shall be taken and all admitted claims for which the petitioner is entitled shall be extended within the same time.

4. Accordingly, this writ petitions stands disposed of. (Ajit Kumar, J) Abhishek/- U