← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./34286/2022bail granted

Munni Kumari v. The State Of Bihar Through Vigilance Investigation Bureau, Patna

2022-11-28Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34286 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2022 Thana- CHERIYA BARIYARPUR DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== MUNNI KUMARI D/o Ajay Kumar R/o village- Pawra Dabh, P.S.- Birpur, District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH VIGILANCE INVESTIGATION BUREAU, PATNA Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 36184 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2022 Thana- CHERIYA BARIYARPUR DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== RANJEET PASWAN SON OF NATHO PASWAN RESIDENT OF MOHALLA- CHERIA BARIYARPUR, P.S.- CHERIA BARIYARPUR, DISTRICT- BEGUSARAI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 34286 of 2022) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nakul Kumar Jamuar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Arvind Kumar, Spl. P.P.

(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 36184 of 2022) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Alok Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Tapeshwar Sharma, Advocate Mr. Arvind Kumar, Spl. P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 28-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State and learned Spl. P.P for the Vigilance. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467,

2/4 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a woman and the informant alleges that the petitioner secured appointment as Panchayat Teacher based on forged mark sheet and certificate of BETET.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that the present F.I.R came to be instituted based on an inquiry conducted behind the back of petitioner. It is also submitted that had an opportunity been given to the petitioner before instituting an F.I.R., perhaps the present F.I.R would not have been instituted.

Learned Spl. P.P for the Vigilance opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case

3/4 is pending/successor court in connection with Cheriya Bariyarpur P.S. Case No. 05 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 36184 of 2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State and learned Spl. P.P for the Vigilance. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that the petitioner secured appointment as Panchayat Teacher based on forged mark sheet and certificate of BETET. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that the present F.I.R came to be instituted based on an inquiry conducted behind the back of petitioner. It is also submitted that had an opportunity been given to the petitioner before instituting an F.I.R., perhaps the present F.I.R would not have been instituted.

Learned Spl. P.P for the Vigilance opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

4/4 Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Cheriya Bariyarpur P.S. Case No. 05 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T