← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/8994/2025disposed

Sita Ram Mandal v. The Election Commission Of India

2025-07-11Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8994 of 2025 ====================================================== Sita Ram Mandal S/o- Late Ram Swaroop Mandal Resident of VillageBathnaha, P.S.- Khanpur, District- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Election Commission of India New Delhi.

2.

The Chief Electoral Officer, Election Department, Mangness Road, Patna. 3.

The Chief Election Officer, Bihar, Patna.

4.

The District Magistrate-cum- Election Officer, Samastipur. 5.

The Block Development Officer-cum- Block Election Officer, Khanpur, Samastipur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vijay Anand, Advocate For the ECI :

Mr. Siddharth Prasad, Advocate For the State :

Mr. AAG-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the respondent-Election Commission of India and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The present writ petition has been filed in the nature of mandamus for commanding the respondents especially Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 to make necessary correction in the Part No.198, 199 and 200 of the Legislative Assembly voter List of 2025 of Constituency No. 132 (Waris Nagar, General) and Lok Sabha Constituency No. 23 Samastipur- Schedule Caste.

3. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondentElection Commission of India raised objection with regard to

Patna High Court CWJC No.8994 of 2025(2) dt.11-07-2025 2/2 the maintainability of the present writ application on the ground that the relief which has been claimed by the petitioner on behalf of himself and also on behalf of others can very well be addressed if the petitioner takes appropriate steps under the Registration of Electoral Rule, 1960.

4. In response to the aforesaid objections raised by the learned counsel for the respondent-Election Commission of India, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ application may be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to take appropriate steps under the Registration of Electoral Rule, 1960.

5. Under the aforesaid circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to take appropriate steps under the Registration of Electoral Rule, 1960 for claiming the relief as claimed for in the present writ application.

6. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the writ application is disposed of. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.

(Alok Kumar Sinha, J) ajay/- U