Patna High CourtCWJC/18630/2014disposed

Narendra Kuamr Pandey v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-09-25Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18630 of 2014 ====================================================== Narendra Kuamr Pandey son of late Bikrama Pandey resident of village - Mauza Goa, P.O. Goa Piparpatti, Police Station - Baniyapur, District - Saran (Chapra).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, Primary Education, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra.

4. The District Education Officer, Saran at Chapra.

5. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Saran at Chapra.

6. The Block Development Officer, Baniyapur Block, District - Saran.

7. The Block Education Officer, Baniyapur, District - Saran.

8. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Goa Piparpatti, Block Baniyapur, District - Saran.

9. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Goa Piparpatti, Block Baniyapur, District - Saran.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Upendra Kr. Singh, AC to GA-8 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 25-09-2018 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition to enable the petitioner to approach the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority as the petitioner has not earlier moved the Appellate Authority. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority.

In the event the petitioner files appeal, the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority will consider the

Patna High Court CWJC No.18630 of 2014(2) dt.25-09-2018 2/2 case of the petitioner and decide the appeal on its own merit after condoning the delay in filing the appeal in accordance with law as the present writ petition has remained pending before this Court for about four years.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) spandey/- U