← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./34435/2026bail granted

Saurav @ Saurav Kumar @ Praveen Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-05-19Mr. Justice Praveen Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34435 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2026 Thana- HILSA District- Nalanda ====================================================== Saurav @ Saurav Kumar @ Praveen Kumar S/o Tarun Kumar R/o Village - Laxmi Bigha, P.S. - Hilsa, District - Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Sevak Choudhary, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Hilsa P.S. Case No. 181 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126 (2), 329 (3), 109 (1), 351 (3), 352 and 3 (5) of B.N.S. 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner along with two others came at the doorsteps of the informant and started abusing him in filthy languages, when the informant came out of the house the petitioner and others were found to be armed with firearms. It has further been alleged that petitioner along with others fired from their respective weapon but the informant anyhow saved himself and entered the house.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34435 of 2026(2) dt.19-05-2026 2/2 It has further been submitted that there is delay of nine days in lodging the F.I.R. It has further been submitted that no marks of violence was found at the place of the occurrence. It has further been submitted that petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the nature of allegation against the petitioner, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned in connection with Hilsa P.S. Case No. 181 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharitya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.)

7. This application stands allowed.

(Praveen Kumar, J) vashudha/- U T