Panki Gope v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3776 of 2015 Arising out of P.S. Case No. -5 Year- 2014 Thana -FATUHA District- PATNA =================================================== Panki Gope Son of Ram Sawarath Gope @ Swarath Gope Resident of Vill-Nirmalichak, P.S-Khusrupur, Distt.-Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s =================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Deepak Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Gajendra Prasad Yadav (APP) ================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 02.
29.01.2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner, Informant and the State.
The Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 364/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Considering that there is no direct material against the Petitioner who has fair antecedents, let him be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City, Patna in connection with Fatuha P.S. Case No. 5 of 2014 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3776 of 2015 (2) dt.29-01-2015 with the Petitioner and the other bailor shall be the father of the Petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse.
(iv) That the Petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.
Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.) U T