Ravindra Sah @ Ravindra Kumar Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38769 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-175 Year-2023 Thana- ANDHRAMATH District- Madhubani ====================================================== Ravindra Sah @ Ravindra Kumar Sah son of Shambhu sah Vill- Narahi, PsAndhramath, Dist-Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Jitendra Bharti, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 27-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Anadhramath P.S. Case No. 175 of 2023 lodged on 31.10.2023 under Section 279, 337, 338, 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.
3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against the named accused persons including the petitioner and total recovery of 81 litres wine is the subject matter of the present case.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been made accuse in this case at the instance of police due to the reason that antecedent of the petitioner is not clean. There are 4
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38769 of 2024(2) dt.27-05-2024 2/2 criminal cases pending against the petitioner. Learned counsel further submits that he is in custody since 14.03.2024 and he is ready to fulfil all the conditions imposed upon him.
5. Learned counsel for the State submits that antecedent of the petitioner is not clean and he is involved in the selling of wine.
6. In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Therefore, the prayer of bail is rejected.
7. However the petitioner is given liberty to renew his prayer for bail on three months after framing of charge. (Dr. Anshuman, J) ravikr/- U T