Raj Narayan Singh @ Jangla @ Raj Narayan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31553 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3 Year-2019 Thana- SAMASTIPUR MUFFASIL District- Samastipur ====================================================== RAJ NARAYAN SINGH @ JANGLA @ RAJ NARAYAN KUMAR aged about 36 years, male, Son of Late Brijmohan Singh Resident of Village - Ladora, P.S.- Kalyanpur, District- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Ranjan Kumar, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party:

APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 15-05-2019 Learned counsel for the petitioner states that copy of the case diary has been called for in the matter of co-accused in Cr. Misc. No. 18673 of 2019.

2. As prayed, let this case be listed along with Cr. Misc. No. 18673 of 2019 before an appropriate Bench after obtaining orders of Hon'ble the Chief Justice.

3. Considering the submission of the petitioner that in similar circumstances interim orders have been granted in Cr. Misc. No. 18673 of 2019, in the event of petitioner's arrest or surrender within four weeks hereof let the above named petitioner be released on provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- [ten thousand] with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31553 of 2019(2) dt.15-05-2019 2/2 Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-V, Samastipur in connection with Samastipur (M) P.S. Case No. 03 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions - (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar//- U T