← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./33747/2020bail granted

Shabuddin Dewan v. The State Of Bihar

2021-02-26Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33747 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-214 Year-2020 Thana- CHHATAUNI District- East Champaran ====================================================== SHABUDDIN DEWAN S/o Salim Dewan R/o village- Jhakhiya, P.S.- Banjariya, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dhannjay Kumar No 2 For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nityanand Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 26-02-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 270 & 272/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections-30(a), 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 4534.905 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. The name of the petitioner has transpired in this case on the basis of disclosure made by the co-accused. Except

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33747 of 2020(2) dt.26-02-2021 2/2 for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. It is alleged that 4534.905 liters wine is recovered from the truck in question. The truck in question does not belong to the petitioner. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-VII-cum-Special Judge, Excise Act, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Chhatauni P.S. Case No. 214 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V.//- U T