Vijay Singh @ Bijay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32990 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-109 Year-2025 Thana- NAYA RAM NAGAR District- Munger ====================================================== Vijay Singh @ Bijay Kumar Son of Late Krishnandan Singh R/o- Village - Itahari P.s- NayaRamnagar Dist - Munger Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Princy Raj, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 13-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Naya Ram Nagar P.S. Case No. 109 of 2025 lodged on 03.12.2025, for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 74, 324(4), 324(5), 352 & 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against six named accused persons including the present petitioner. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with other accused persons have assaulted the informant by iron rod and khanti due to which, head injury has been caused. The allegation of damaging the vehicle is also there. Subsequently,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32990 of 2026(2) dt.13-05-2026 2/3 the informant's side called the police for help.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel submits that from the content of the FIR, it become crystal clear that basic cause of dispute is keeping the cow dung at a place. Both the parties started scuffling due to which injuries have been caused to both the sides. He submits that prior to filing of the FIR, the proceeding under section 126 of the BNSS has been initiated against the parties, in which, bond was directed to be submitted. But, even then, the scuffling took place and there are case and counter case for the same date and place of occurrence from both the sides. He further submits that the criminal antecedent of the petitioner is not clean as there is one case pending against him in which, he is on bail.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner but fairly submits that from the record, it transpires that for the same date and place of occurrence, there are case and counter case from both the sides and both parties are resident of the same village.
6. As such, in the present facts and circumstances of this case, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32990 of 2026(2) dt.13-05-2026 3/3 Trial Court within a period of 4 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) as mentioned in Section 2(1)(d) of the B.N.S.S., 2023 to the satisfaction of J.M. 1st Class, Munger, in connection with Naya Ram Nagar P.S. Case No. 109 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down U/s 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023. (Dr. Anshuman, J) Divyansh/- U T