← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./34122/2025bail granted

Vikky Kumar @ Bikki Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-29Mr. Justice S. B. P. Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34122 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-204 Year-2025 Thana- BARUN District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1.

Vikky Kumar @ Bikki Kumar S/O Dukhan Choudhary R/O VillageMohanganj, Barun, P.S.- Barun,Distt-Aurangabad(Bihar) 2.

Dukhan Choudhary S/O Late Rampyare Choudhary R/O VillageMohanganj, Barun, P.S.- Barun,Distt-Aurangabad(Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Aman Vishal, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Barun P.S. Case No. 204 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 30(g) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act.

3. Recovery of total 193 litres of country made illicit liquor has been made from the Navodya School which is the subject matter of the present case.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. They have got no criminal antecedent. They have no concern with the alleged recovery or with the place of occurrence. All the allegations levelled against the petitioners are general and omnibus and no specific allegations have been alleged against them.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34122 of 2025(2) dt.29-05-2025 2/2 Nothing incriminating has been seized from the conscious possession of petitioners. Petitioner no. 2 namely Dukhan Chaudhary was even not present at the place of occurrence on the alleged date rather he has been arrested from a different place. Both the petitioners are in custody since 21.04.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.

6. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and considering the period under custody, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail after framing of charge on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned District and Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Exclusive Special Judge, Excise Court - First, Aurangabad in connection with Barun P.S. Case No. 204 of 2025 subject to the following conditions :- (i). Petitioners will remain physically present in trial on each and every date till the disposal of the case failing which, on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner may be cancelled by the Trial Court. (ii). One of the bailor shall be his family member. (S. B. Pd. Singh, J) Ankit Kumar/- U T