Raj Kumar Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.9853 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -180 Year- 2015 Thana -KALYANPUR District- SAMASTIPUR ====================================================== Raj Kumar Rai, son of Late Golhai Rai, resident of Village- Chhakan Toli, P.S.- Kalyanpur, District- Samastipur.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Abhay Kr.Roy (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 11-04-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kalyanpur P.S Case No. 180 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 366(A), 363/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, Dolly Kumari the minor sister of the informant was kidnapped by the petitioner and other co-accused. During investigation the victim girl was recovered by the police and her statement has been recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. wherein she has supported the allegation of kidnapping against the petitioner but has not stated regarding any sexual harassment done to her.

In the facts and circumstances stated above,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9853 of 2016 (3) dt.11-04-2016 2/2 considering the detention of the petitioner and as such petitioner is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate.-II, Samastipur in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 180 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the Court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U T