Ravindra Ram @ Ravindra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43600 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-151 Year-2021 Thana- SIWAN MUFFASIL District- Siwan ====================================================== Ravindra Ram @ Ravindra Kumar, Gender-Male, aged about 25 years, S/O Bachcha Ram, R/O Village-Rampur, P.S.-Siwan Muffasil, District-Siwan. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Javed Aslam, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-10-2021 Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, within a period of eight weeks.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Siwan Muffasil P.S. Case No. 151/2021 for the offence registered under Sections 272, 273 of the I.P.C. and 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that total 87.24 liters wine is recovered from the Bush situated in front of the house belonging to joint family of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43600 of 2021(2) dt.25-10-2021 2/3 It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is alleged that total 87.24 liters wine is recovered from the Bush situated in front of the house belonging to joint family of the petitioner. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr. P.C.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ Complaint Case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge-Second-cumSpecial Judge, Excise, Siwan, in connection with Siwan

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43600 of 2021(2) dt.25-10-2021 3/3 Muffasil P.S. Case No. 151/2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U T