Pappu Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32954 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-14 Year-2025 Thana- GOPALPUR District- West Champaran ====================================================== Pappu Sah S/o Pannalal Sah R/o Village- Baishakhawa, P.S.- Gopalpur, Dist.- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Kumar Veerendra Narayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 22-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 309 (4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. The allegation in the first information report is that two unknown miscreants have committed robbery of an erickshaw on which they had taken ride on the point of knife.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the first information report was lodged against unknown and the petitioner was arrested only on the basis of suspicion on account of his criminal antecedent. As a matter of fact, there is no recovery from the petitioner and he has not been put on test identification parade. Petitioner has been in
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32954 of 2025(2) dt.22-05-2025 2/2 custody since 25.01.2025 and now the charge sheet has been submitted. It has also been pointed out that one co-accused, Gaisul Alam @ Gashul Azam has already been granted privilege of bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 14.05.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No.31242 of 2025.
5. Learned APP for the State opposed the bail petition.
6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Gopalpur P.S. Case No.14 of 2025, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Soni Shrivastava, J) Trivedi/- U T