Bandana Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16567 of 2018 ====================================================== Bandana Devi Wife of Dilip Kumar Singh, Resident of House No. 214, Ward No.- 2 Govindwara, P.O. and P.S. Phenhara, District- East Champaran at Motihari, Ex- Pramukh of Block Panchayat Samiti, Phenhara, District- East Champaran at Motihari.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari, District- East Champaran at Motihari.

5.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Motihari District- East Champaran at Motihari. 6.

The Block Development Officer, Phenhara-cum-Executive Officer, Block Panchayat Samiti, Phenhara, Di 7.

Kamlesh Kumar, Son of not known to the petitioner. 8.

Ashok Kumar, Son of not known to the petitioner. 9.

Rani Kumari, Wife of not known to the petitioner. 10.

Rahmat Ara, Wife of not known to the petitioner. 11.

Bibha Kumari, Wife of not known to the petitioner. Respondent nos. 7 to 11 are the members of Block Panchayat Samiti Phenhara through the Block Development Officer-cum-Executive Officer, Block Panchayat Samiti, Phenhara, P.O. and P.S.- Phenhara District- East Champaran at Motihari. 12.

The State Election Commission Panchayat Sone Bhawan, Birchand Patel Path, Patna through the Secret ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Anita Kumari, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Ajay, GA-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 07-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the State Election Commission, Mr. Sanjeev Nikesh.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by

Patna High Court CWJC No.16567 of 2018(4) dt.07-04-2023 2/2 efflux of time, the writ application has become infructuous and thus seeks permission to withdraw the writ application. Permission is accorded.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U